As a first post, I want to give an insight into me and my perspectives. I have been blogging (unsuccessfully) for at least a year. As determined and motivated as I am to making things work out for me, my last blog just wasn't going anywhere. However, with a wider interpretation, my blogging overall can be improved upon instead. Leaving it as a hidden, shady and unsuccessful part of my history would feel as if I was going against my character, and so is not an option. So, in accordance with new year, I begin again. I felt this following post, and it's introduction, would give an insight into me and my perspective.
I began blogging as an AS English student, with an analytical and, to a certain extent, philosophical outlook on the world. Although blogging began as a way to express these opinions, maintaining it has become an attempt to preserve them.
Changing to study law has changed my perspective. Constantly considering causation and liability causes me to have a much more purposeful and determined outlook, with a desire to establish action, consequence and guilt. My previous attitude, of always seeing the world in a new light and from unexpected angles has perhaps been overshadowed by this.
Justice is normally associated with law, however I would argue that both approaches support it. Without tirelessly attempting to see all sides of an issue, fairness can never be reached. However, without determination and some forcefulness, no 'justice' would ever be apply end. I think both are equally important parts in considering the true meaning of justice.
Perhaps what I am trying to express is the need for open mindedness. This quality helps no end in writing successful AS law responses, but for wider life it is essential.
Justice, law, and open minded philosophy are not entirely separate, nor unrelated. All are needed together, and in moderation, for us to have a truly fair society.
I began blogging as an AS English student, with an analytical and, to a certain extent, philosophical outlook on the world. Although blogging began as a way to express these opinions, maintaining it has become an attempt to preserve them.
Changing to study law has changed my perspective. Constantly considering causation and liability causes me to have a much more purposeful and determined outlook, with a desire to establish action, consequence and guilt. My previous attitude, of always seeing the world in a new light and from unexpected angles has perhaps been overshadowed by this.
Justice is normally associated with law, however I would argue that both approaches support it. Without tirelessly attempting to see all sides of an issue, fairness can never be reached. However, without determination and some forcefulness, no 'justice' would ever be apply end. I think both are equally important parts in considering the true meaning of justice.
Perhaps what I am trying to express is the need for open mindedness. This quality helps no end in writing successful AS law responses, but for wider life it is essential.
Justice, law, and open minded philosophy are not entirely separate, nor unrelated. All are needed together, and in moderation, for us to have a truly fair society.